I don't know if we needed to post a reading summary or not, but Bianca reminded me, so I'm doing one anyways :)
Ok, so I'm reading this book called State of Fear by Michael Crichton. It's a novel about the theory of global warming. It is fiction, but all the facts and reasonings are cited in the back of the book.
So the quote I chose was, "Sanjong and I gave you a careful, peer-reviewed interpretation of data. Made by several groups of scientists from several different countries. And your response was first to ignore it, and then to make an ad hominem arrack. You didn't answer the data. You didn't answer the data. You didn't provide counter evidence. You just smeared with innuendo."
I chose this quote because this was a quote that I can really relate to, but on a lower scale. In this part, Kenner (An MIT professor) is trying to convince Peter (A lawyer who normally deals with environmental issues) that global warming is still a THEORY and there is hard earned evidence that can support AGAINST global warming. Peter tried to counter argue, a little, by saying that Antarctica is melting. But in fact, only 2% is melting in Antarctica, while the rest is growing colder.
In the book, there are A LOT of other facts that surprised. Like the ocean level hasn't risen in nearly 30 years. And the degrees is actually colder then it was a number of thousand of years ago.
I chose this quote because it made me feel the same way I had the whole book. What is global warming? If people are so sure of it, then why hasn't it been PROVEN, and is just left as a THEORY. All the facts made by scientists that go against global warming must be simply overlooked. And any small factor that can contribute to it is spread, global wide. I have always believed in global warming, but I look back now and realize that I was easily swayed. I believed what the t.v. said, and what other people said. But now, this book is showing me the counter-side.
I still don't know if I am 100% against global warming, but I know I am not 100% for global warming.